COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.999 [SLACK_001213] · slack_pm:msg:10417

Page text: p.999 · original PDF

Date
2021-09-21 08:05
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I agree - need to stay on top of this.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-09-21 08:01 Kristian G. Andersen open
    IMO we really _do_ need to take a close look at what's described in this grant and look back at our (now expanded)alignments to see if anything pops up. E.g., Bob mentioned that there are differences in Laos bat vs SC2 when itcomes to N-linked glycans, which isn't particularly reassuring - that's the kind of work described on page 11.
  2. 2021-09-21 08:05 Andrew Rambaut
    I agree - need to stay on top of this.
  3. 2021-09-21 08:05 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yes - this can't (shouldn't) be dismissed out of hand.
  4. 2021-09-21 08:06 Andrew Rambaut open
    If there is anything suspicious - better that we say it and then address it. If there isn't then we can let it blow over.
  5. 2021-09-21 08:06 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Exactly. I suspect it'll be the latter.
  6. 2021-09-21 08:08 Andrew Rambaut open
    Me too. But it really isn't beyond plausibility that someone went ahead and tried some of this stuff. We just need tore-convince ourselves it is coincidence.

Full conversation →