COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.993 · slack_pm:msg:10356

Page text: p.993 · original PDF

Date
2021-08-24 01:31 (hour precision)
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Other than sending this to Jeremy and Tony, did we email around each other? I think we were all on Slack by then?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-08-24 01:30 Andrew Rambaut open
    shared file(s): image.png
  2. 2021-08-24 01:31 Andrew Rambaut open
    I am not sure they should have left any quoted email from a third party (i.e., Jon) unredacted? SLACK_001207
  3. 2021-08-24 01:31 Edward C. Holmes open
    Should be redacted as should all of my reply. Had nothing to do with Fauci.
  4. 2021-08-24 01:31 Edward C. Holmes open
    As I don't think Fauci will be able to release party emails we'll probably get another FOIA request now. They'll probably be distracted for a bit now because the WHO thing is out in Nature tomorrow. What will drive them nuts.
  5. 2021-08-24 01:31 Andrew Rambaut
    Other than sending this to Jeremy and Tony, did we email around each other? I think we were all on Slack by then?
  6. 2021-08-24 01:31 Edward C. Holmes open
    Not sure. Because Jeremy was involved we did it through email. It didn't take us long.
  7. 2021-08-24 01:31 Andrew Rambaut open
    But none of the banter, speculation about who it might be, I think? Will check but I am pretty sure it is all on this channel. Update: not much in email but there is this..
  8. 2021-08-24 01:31 Andrew Rambaut open
    shared file(s): image.png
  9. 2021-08-24 01:31 Andrew Rambaut open
    As you say, the 'Here are the facts:' reply is good should it ever get out

Full conversation →