Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.992 [SLACK_001206] · slack_pm:msg:10350

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

But Fauci was not on those emails

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-08-24 00:56 Edward C. Holmes open

1. Is this through a Fauci FOIA request? If so, why has it come up at all? 2. My 'Here are the facts' email is a really good one for us. I'm happy for it to be out there, although I'll them go through the pain of tying to get it. 3. Perhapswe can get The Seeker to reveal who DT is? That would be fun.
2021-08-24 01:27 Andrew Rambaut open

New NIH FOIA I think.
2021-08-24 01:28 Andrew Rambaut open

I wonder what Jon will do. He could release the email he got from DT
2021-08-24 01:29 Edward C. Holmes

But Fauci was not on those emails
2021-08-24 01:29 Andrew Rambaut open

The first one is to Fauci from Kristian
2021-08-24 01:30 Andrew Rambaut open

shared file(s): image.png
2021-08-24 01:31 Andrew Rambaut open

I am not sure they should have left any quoted email from a third party (i.e., Jon) unredacted? SLACK_001207
2021-08-24 01:31 Edward C. Holmes open

Should be redacted as should all of my reply. Had nothing to do with Fauci.