Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.990 [SLACK_001204] · slack_pm:msg:10321

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Ah, yes. And that whole email thread is great - lots of good science in there (mostly pointing out that I was wrong inmy initial concerns).

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-08-16 14:54 Robert F. Garry open

That could be.
2021-08-16 15:35 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Andrew Rambaut - where did this leak? And yeah - I think you were talking about cats if I remember correctly our conversations back then.
2021-08-16 15:37 Andrew Rambaut open

I don't think it has leaked - it was just in Bob's PDF document above.
2021-08-16 15:37 Andrew Rambaut open

But I am thinking it wouldn't be bad if it did leak. Shows we were discussing all the options at the meeting.
2021-08-16 15:38 Kristian G. Andersen

Ah, yes. And that whole email thread is great - lots of good science in there (mostly pointing out that I was wrong inmy initial concerns).
2021-08-16 15:38 Andrew Rambaut open

And I was the voice of reason amongst you CCP hating nutters.
2021-08-16 15:38 Andrew Rambaut open

Oh. Hang on you are CCP loving nutters now
2021-08-16 15:40 Robert F. Garry open

I get emails somewhat along those lines...
2021-08-16 15:40 Kristian G. Andersen open

Thing is though - we don't want this shit to leak, because they will spin single words into their little narratives.Happened to me a few times - I mean, my while interaction with Fauci is a textbook example of exactly how this works, yet.... Which also reminds me, since I have yet again gotten hacking attacks - I assume everybody have their emails locked down with strong passwords and 2FA? There are emails that we certainly don't want out there because they'll be spun (several identified in Eddie's FOIA come to mind...)