Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.989 [SLACK_001203] · slack_pm:msg:10316

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Perhaps it was the bags of cats?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-08-16 14:37 Andrew Rambaut open

I am impressed with myself... would be happy if this one leaked out: [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-08-16 14:38 Andrew Rambaut open

But does anyone remember what I was talking about with respect to "reports, but no information, about virus from non-human animals in Wuhan"?
2021-08-16 14:39 Robert F. Garry open

It was the 99% pangolin virus that turned out to be not 99% IIRC.
2021-08-16 14:44 Andrew Rambaut open

I am not sure - that wasn't in Wuhan (and we knew it wasn't).
2021-08-16 14:44 Andrew Rambaut

Perhaps it was the bags of cats?
2021-08-16 14:54 Robert F. Garry open

That could be.
2021-08-16 15:35 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Andrew Rambaut - where did this leak? And yeah - I think you were talking about cats if I remember correctly our conversations back then.
2021-08-16 15:37 Andrew Rambaut open

I don't think it has leaked - it was just in Bob's PDF document above.
2021-08-16 15:37 Andrew Rambaut open

But I am thinking it wouldn't be bad if it did leak. Shows we were discussing all the options at the meeting.