Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.981 [SLACK_001195] · slack_pm:msg:10217

Date: 2021-07-09 09:28
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker: Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

The Edinburgh lawyers are taking the risk of harm approach and are going to refuse to release any emails. It mightgo to the information commissioner but given all the shit that has happened it seems likely to be accepted.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-07-09 09:28 Andrew Rambaut

The Edinburgh lawyers are taking the risk of harm approach and are going to refuse to release any emails. It mightgo to the information commissioner but given all the shit that has happened it seems likely to be accepted.
2021-07-09 09:29 Kristian G. Andersen open

That's great - and definitely the right choice! This has NOTHING to do with "freedom of information" and everythingto do with targeted harassment.
2021-07-09 09:30 Andrew Rambaut open

It did make me laugh that they asked for my copy of the missing WIV database. Nice try.
2021-07-09 09:31 Andrew Rambaut open

The lawyer said that even if I had it they wouldn't release it - but they might have had to say they had it which would have sent Drastic nuts.

Full conversation →