COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.967 [SLACK_001181] · slack_pm:msg:10078

Page text: p.967 · original PDF

Date
2021-06-29 18:57
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

If I'm your average punter, I don't want to hear about false equivalence. I just want to know if it came out of a lab ornot.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-06-29 18:34 Edward C. Holmes open
    I'm going to blow my brains out if people getting adding text. It's not an undergrad essay FFS.
  2. 2021-06-29 18:45 Kristian G. Andersen open
    We should lock editing on the new version...
  3. 2021-06-29 18:57 Edward C. Holmes
    If I'm your average punter, I don't want to hear about false equivalence. I just want to know if it came out of a lab ornot.
  4. 2021-06-29 19:04 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Hah - that edit was mine and I actually think that point is really key :wink:. But hey, all good to axe :axe:
  5. 2021-06-29 19:08 Edward C. Holmes open
    The point is correct, but not for this doc. We need to end on a simple and powerful argument - no direct evidence fora lab escape.

Full conversation →