Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.963 [SLACK_001177] · slack_pm:msg:10033

Date: 2021-06-25 15:09
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker: Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

It doesn't cite our recombination in B.1.1.7 paper - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.18.21258689v1 (which was also on virological for a few months)

Links shared

preprint https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.18.21258689v1

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-25 15:05 Andrew Rambaut open

Hang on - I will check to see if this is one of the same recombinant we discuss in our preprint.
2021-06-25 15:08 Edward C. Holmes open

Perhaps I should post it and let the public decide
2021-06-25 15:09 Andrew Rambaut

It doesn't cite our recombination in B.1.1.7 paper - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.18.21258689v1 (which was also on virological for a few months)
2021-06-25 15:10 Edward C. Holmes open

This paper is saying that B.1.1.7 is itself a recombinant
2021-06-25 15:10 Andrew Rambaut open

It also doesn't cite our original virological post https://virological.org/t/563 which gives a suggestion of how it arose (not stepwise)
2021-06-25 15:11 Andrew Rambaut open

It isn't a recombinant.
2021-06-25 15:11 Andrew Rambaut open

But I don't care really - it won't get anywhere

Full conversation →