Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.962 [SLACK_001176] · slack_pm:msg:10021

Date: 2021-06-24 03:42
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I'm trying to get them to do it. From what I understand via Shi is they feel they are in a damned if they do/damned ifthey don't scenario. But good to advise them it would be communicated through some trusted journalists. I'll keep trying.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-24 02:55 Edward C. Holmes open

@Robert Garry Do you think the Wang et al. people who publicly say why they deleted the data? That would help a lot. Perhaps this can be communicated through John Cohen at Science (or even Kai) that it is reported in a neutralway? I can also ask Yongyi to tell Jon about the pangolin deletion.
2021-06-24 03:42 Robert F. Garry

I'm trying to get them to do it. From what I understand via Shi is they feel they are in a damned if they do/damned ifthey don't scenario. But good to advise them it would be communicated through some trusted journalists. I'll keep trying.

Full conversation →