COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.951-952 [SLACK_001165] · slack_pm:msg:09898

Page text: p.951, p.952 · original PDF

Date
2021-06-20 10:16
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

(otherwise, why the heck would they include Table 1...)

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-06-20 10:07 Kristian G. Andersen open
    It's racism. Full stop.
  2. 2021-06-20 10:11 Andrew Rambaut open
    Is the exact same data deleted from NCBI on NGDC?
  3. 2021-06-20 10:15 Robert F. Garry open
    I made stab at finding it - PRJNA612766 doesn't pull anything up on NGDC. But, they could have renamed it or just didn't bother yet.
  4. 2021-06-20 10:16 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I'm digging too... Irrespective of this, all the relevant SNPs are in Table 1 - not trying to "hide" anything
  5. 2021-06-20 10:16 Kristian G. Andersen
    (otherwise, why the heck would they include Table 1...)
  6. 2021-06-20 10:19 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Also, it's not that they mentioned the BioProject in their paper and then later pulled it - they added it there, presumably to later share the data, but then took it down for whatever (likely non-nefarious) reasons. Maybe the IPlawyers told them to. Maybe they thought, you know, maybe next time. Maybe they didn't have full IRB approval toshare the raw data - who knows. What I find deeply problematic here actually has to do with the SRA - apparently "deleting" data from the SRA doesn't actually do that. That's a HUGE issue for many other reasons
  7. 2021-06-20 10:39 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Joel will join us for the call in 20 mins too

Full conversation →