Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.934 [SLACK_001148] · slack_pm:msg:09711

Page text: p.934 · original PDF

Date: 2021-06-08 11:34
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Just saw the other post from Metzl - he's also a liar and thug.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-08 11:03 Robert F. Garry open

zepnep = a little too far gone... [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-06-08 11:04 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup, she's gone. I'd love to have her explain exactly what version of the lab leak isn't a conspiracy theory - Icertainly can't think of any.
2021-06-08 11:07 Kristian G. Andersen open

I think I can see where her article is going - "the lab leak debate was silenced by labeling those believing in it asconspiracy theorists". There'll be others like it.It's disgusting.
2021-06-08 11:19 Robert F. Garry open

@Kristian Andersen - thanks for posting the Metzl piece. I will give him credit for becoming more forthwith - at least he's upfront now with clearly laying out that it's a cover-up and conspiracy. I'm more ok with that than the Relmandoubletalk. I'm moving this over here to the executive group off record. I just this morning did a long interview for ABC Nightline - they mentioned that Metzl (maybe Relman likely Carrol and Koopsman all) on it. I'm guessing that what Metzl put up there is the same script he gave Nightline. Was I successful in rebutting - we'll see - always at themercy of what may drop on the cutting room floor. post-interview I got the impression they liked what they heard. Got this from the producer as well. [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-06-08 11:34 Robert F. Garry

Just saw the other post from Metzl - he's also a liar and thug.
2021-06-08 11:36 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup - but unfortunately not enough to sue.
2021-06-08 11:40 Robert F. Garry open

Plus you're a public figure. Bar higher. You thereby have to prove actual malice (not just that what was said was false) - in this case perhaps not so difficult.
2021-06-08 11:40 Robert F. Garry open

Sharri as well.
2021-06-08 11:46 Kristian G. Andersen open

We just have to accept that people like Jamie will win in the short-term, knowing that science will ultimately prevail.I'm fine with that.

Full conversation →