COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.928 · slack_pm:msg:09647

Page text: p.928 · original PDF

Date
2021-06-06 14:37 (hour precision)
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen
Topics
Lab-leak / accidental release hypothesis

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Also, I find that my reply to Relman had a few salient points... Not at least "Importantly, no evidence has been presented to support any connection to the lab - which remains a speculative theory that would necessarily involve a major cover up and complex web of lies perpetrated by the very scientists and public health authorities that you thank in the end of your letter. Unless there's direct evidence to support such aconspiracy, I think we have to be very careful that we don't unnecessarily add to ongoing anti-Asian racism and hate crimes. I am of course well aware that that is not the intent of your letter, however, it should be clear that it will fan the flames of xenophobia and conspiracy theories - with allegations of a lab leak having no scientific grounding inavailable evidence or data.I hope they're happy.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
I am of course well aware that that is not the intent of your letter, however, it should be clear that it will fan the flames of xenophobia and conspiracy theories - with allegations of a lab leak having no scientific grounding inavailable evidence or data.I hope they're happy. own voice, substantive speaker_own asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-06-06 14:37 Robert F. Garry open
    What's going on in Ireland?
  2. 2021-06-06 14:37 Robert F. Garry open
    A few exchanges with zeynep - she may be a lost cause...
  3. 2021-06-06 14:37 Edward C. Holmes open
    I wonder if Jon will ever leak the Deep Throat email. Point 8 in our response is somewhat topical. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-06-07 at 8.25.33 am.png]
  4. 2021-06-06 14:37 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Hah. Yeah.
  5. 2021-06-06 14:37 Kristian G. Andersen
    Also, I find that my reply to Relman had a few salient points... Not at least "Importantly, no evidence has been presented to support any connection to the lab - which remains a speculative theory that would necessarily involve a major cover up and complex web of lies perpetrated by the very scientists and public health authorities that you thank in the end of your letter. Unless there's direct evidence to support such aconspiracy, I think we have to be very careful that we don't unnecessarily add to ongoing anti-Asian racism and hate crimes. I am of course well aware that that is not the intent of your letter, however, it should be clear that it will fan the flames of xenophobia and conspiracy theories - with allegations of a lab leak having no scientific grounding inavailable evidence or data.I hope they're happy.
  6. 2021-06-06 14:37 Edward C. Holmes open
    Shall I post that email on the other channel?
  7. 2021-06-06 15:32 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, why not - no harm in that (I actually think I might have shared it with Stephen a while bacl)
  8. 2021-06-06 15:34 Edward C. Holmes open
    It's a good clear history
  9. 2021-06-06 15:39 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I'm glad Bret's on it. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-06-06 at 3.33.46 PM.png]

Full conversation →