Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.916 [SLACK_001130] · slack_pm:msg:09497

Date: 2021-06-04 07:18
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen
Topics: Lab-leak / accidental release hypothesis

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I hadn't actually thought about the possibility of additional spillovers. Would immediately invalidate the lab leak -although, of course, there's a lab there too... A good one. And they're working on CoVs...

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
Would immediately invalidate the lab leak -although, of course, there's a lab there too...	needs context	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

Would immediately invalidate the lab leak -although, of course, there's a lab there too...

needs context

speaker_own

asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-04 07:18 Kristian G. Andersen

I hadn't actually thought about the possibility of additional spillovers. Would immediately invalidate the lab leak -although, of course, there's a lab there too... A good one. And they're working on CoVs...
2021-06-04 07:23 Andrew Rambaut open

What did you mean by 'reintroductions'? Imports from global?
2021-06-04 07:24 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, sorry - I meant new/additional. Not "re"
2021-06-04 07:25 Andrew Rambaut open

I should offer to be a consultant to design a genome that would categorically disprove the lab leak.
2021-06-04 07:25 Andrew Rambaut open

Or that it started in the USA

Full conversation →