Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.901 [SLACK_001115] · slack_pm:msg:09343

Date: 2021-05-31 17:59
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I think might have to give up with that Nature doc. Every time I cut it down, it just expands in size again. I've not got the energy or the time to keep doing this.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-31 17:59 Edward C. Holmes

I think might have to give up with that Nature doc. Every time I cut it down, it just expands in size again. I've not got the energy or the time to keep doing this.
2021-05-31 18:01 Kristian G. Andersen open

No problem - let me go in tomorrow evening and cut. Did Andrew get a chance to take a look? I liked his outline...
2021-05-31 18:09 Edward C. Holmes open

Thanks. It's driving me crazy.
2021-05-31 18:13 Robert F. Garry open

Indeed - run-on sentences and overly long paragraphs. Main concern has to be readability...
2021-05-31 18:17 Edward C. Holmes open

It has to be bang, bang, bang....not bang, clause, subclause, cross-reference, bang

Full conversation →