COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.896 · slack_pm:msg:09297

Page text: p.896 · original PDF

Date
2021-05-29 18:32 (hour precision)
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

|_would_ love to know what happened after that tree was circulated though - image getting that hit, seeing how close 4991 is and then looking up the metadata [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-29 at 10.51.15 PM.png]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-05-29 18:32 Edward C. Holmes open
    Yes, thinking about it you are probably right. Damn! I will check with I assumed it was Shi's group because they were the only people thinking about 4991, but on reflection it cou someone at CCDC.
  2. 2021-05-29 18:32 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, I'm thinking it's somebody who got a short RdRp fragment, did a blast, pulled down related / relevant sequences and created the tree. That wouldn't really mean much - unless, of course, it came from Shi's group. Would be good to ask.
  3. 2021-05-29 18:32 Edward C. Holmes open
    I've just emailed him. I agree though...it does look like a GenBank compilation.
  4. 2021-05-29 18:32 Edward C. Holmes open
    It's the hope that gets you.
  5. 2021-05-29 18:32 Kristian G. Andersen
    |_would_ love to know what happened after that tree was circulated though - image getting that hit, seeing how close 4991 is and then looking up the metadata [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-29 at 10.51.15 PM.png]
  6. 2021-05-29 18:32 Kristian G. Andersen open
    After that realization, you have _got_ to ask yourself "did 4991 just escape from WIV". There's just no other way around it - would love to know what happened the days right after.
  7. 2021-05-29 18:32 Edward C. Holmes open
    Totally! Notice that I did not destroy the file either.
  8. 2021-05-29 18:32 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Hah, I *did* notice that... Shame on you :wink:
  9. 2021-05-29 18:32 Edward C. Holmes open
    So, let's wait for I'll now look at the main doc....I see the comments run for about 3 pages longer...

Full conversation →