Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-05-26 15:05 Robert F. Garry open
   Couple of others think their little paper has held up pretty well: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/scientists-who-doubt-wuhan-lab-theory-still-b[...]ewed-calls-to-probe-covid-origin/ar-AAKpVNJ?ocid=BingNewsSearch
2. 2021-05-26 15:12 Andrew Rambaut open
   @Kristian Andersen Oli reckons he is supportive but doesn't know if he wants to wade in on this. But asked if hecould take a look and decide? I notice the document is currently open to anyone who has the link - perhaps weshould make it an explicit share? Just in case it leaks out.
3. 2021-05-26 15:45 Robert F. Garry open
   FWIW - the NPR guy told me that BL claims that he's been misquoted (seems like a couple of times) and that he still supports PO1. It's just that he wanted to make the point that he thinks working with bat covs at BSL2 is a bad idea.:flipper:
4. 2021-05-26 16:21 Edward C. Holmes open
   Lest we forget (SARS positive racoon dogs): https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2003/09/animals-chinese-markets-carried-sars-virus [shared file(s): science.1087139.full.pdf]
5. 2021-05-26 16:22 Edward C. Holmes
   CIDRAP report is good
6. 2021-05-26 16:41 Andrew Rambaut open
   @Kristian Andersen could you add David to the other channel using
7. 2021-05-26 16:47 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Yup, just added David. All good for Oli to sniff around - as long as he knows that he's either with us or against us...:wink:
8. 2021-05-26 16:47 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Let me get people's Gmail accounts and lock the document
9. 2021-05-26 16:48 Kristian G. Andersen open
   This article is :fire: https://massivesci.com/articles/sars-cov-coronavirus-covid19-lab-leak-hypothesis/

Full conversation →