COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.861 [SLACK_001075] · slack_pm:msg:08959

Page text: p.861 · original PDF

Date
2021-05-24 13:38
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Exactly. The recent interest is driven not by data, but rather by a lack thereof.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-05-24 12:45 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yup - I'm glad to see they select people based on merit and not based on their views. I went through his Bayesian analysis - it's kinda funny and oh so wrong.
  2. 2021-05-24 13:27 Edward C. Holmes open
    https://www.audacy.com/kywnewsradio/news/local/penn-scientists-prefer-one-covid-19-origin-over-another
  3. 2021-05-24 13:29 Edward C. Holmes open
    Obviously Susan Weiss is a good person to have on board
  4. 2021-05-24 13:36 Edward C. Holmes open
    Jeremy Page asked me to comment for the WSJ and he said they would write a 'balanced' piece. I knew he was talking shit. All this press and there has not been a SINGLE PIECE of new evidence for the lab leak.
  5. 2021-05-24 13:38 Kristian G. Andersen
    Exactly. The recent interest is driven not by data, but rather by a lack thereof.

Full conversation →