Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.861 [SLACK_001075] · slack_pm:msg:08955

Date: 2021-05-24 12:45
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yup - I'm glad to see they select people based on merit and not based on their views. I went through his Bayesian analysis - it's kinda funny and oh so wrong.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-24 12:07 Robert F. Garry open

Letter is strong - we need to get it out.
2021-05-24 12:29 Kristian G. Andersen open

Wait, what?? [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-24 at 12.28.50 PM.png]
2021-05-24 12:37 Robert F. Garry open

Republicans
2021-05-24 12:41 Robert F. Garry open

Remember he "totally dismantled" the multi-market virological post, not to mention his Bayesian analysis [which - it'sa bit beyond me - involves mathematics to some degree].
2021-05-24 12:45 Kristian G. Andersen

Yup - I'm glad to see they select people based on merit and not based on their views. I went through his Bayesian analysis - it's kinda funny and oh so wrong.
2021-05-24 13:27 Edward C. Holmes open

https://www.audacy.com/kywnewsradio/news/local/penn-scientists-prefer-one-covid-19-origin-over-another
2021-05-24 13:29 Edward C. Holmes open

Obviously Susan Weiss is a good person to have on board
2021-05-24 13:36 Edward C. Holmes open

Jeremy Page asked me to comment for the WSJ and he said they would write a 'balanced' piece. I knew he was talking shit. All this press and there has not been a SINGLE PIECE of new evidence for the lab leak.
2021-05-24 13:38 Kristian G. Andersen open

Exactly. The recent interest is driven not by data, but rather by a lack thereof.

Full conversation →