Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-05-23 16:47 Robert F. Garry open
   Indeed - I want to archive this here May 23, 2021. Alina apparently reading the WHO report for the first time - did not stop her from saying in the science ltr that WHO report provided no evidence. [shared file(s): image.png]
2. 2021-05-23 16:55 Robert F. Garry open
   The letter is pure dynamite - we need to get it out ASAP.
3. 2021-05-23 17:04 Edward C. Holmes open
   Spectacular!
4. 2021-05-23 17:48 Edward C. Holmes open
   I can't read this. Is there anything of note in it: https://www.wsj.com/articles/intelligence-on-sick-staff-at-wuhan-lab-fuels-debate-on-covid-19-origin-11621796228
5. 2021-05-23 18:07 Kristian G. Andersen
   Nope, it's _exactly_ the same as previously reported - NO new information.
6. 2021-05-23 18:11 Edward C. Holmes open
   Thought so. If 3 staff were sick enough to go to hospital then any outbreak at WIV must have been substantial.
7. 2021-05-23 18:16 Edward C. Holmes open
   And of course, the molecular clock dates put the origin of the virus back to September or so
8. 2021-05-23 18:16 Robert F. Garry open
   I'll send in the morning (i have to be on the University network to get full access).
9. 2021-05-23 18:20 Edward C. Holmes open
   CNN have it better: "The current intelligence reinforces the belief that the virus most likely originated naturally, from animal-human contact, the sources said. But that does not preclude the possibility that the virus was the result of anaccidental leak from the Wuhan Institute, where coronavirus research was being conducted on bats."

Full conversation →