Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.859 [SLACK_001073] · slack_pm:msg:08933

Date: 2021-05-23 17:48
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I can't read this. Is there anything of note in it: https://www.wsj.com/articles/intelligence-on-sick-staff-at-wuhan-lab-fuels-debate-on-covid-19-origin-11621796228

Links shared

news https://www.wsj.com/articles/intelligence-on-sick-staff-at-wuhan-lab-fuels-debate-on-covid-19-origin-11621796228

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-23 16:45 Edward C. Holmes open

I take that as a personal attack and I won't forget
2021-05-23 16:47 Robert F. Garry open

Indeed - I want to archive this here May 23, 2021. Alina apparently reading the WHO report for the first time - did not stop her from saying in the science ltr that WHO report provided no evidence. [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-05-23 16:55 Robert F. Garry open

The letter is pure dynamite - we need to get it out ASAP.
2021-05-23 17:04 Edward C. Holmes open

Spectacular!
2021-05-23 17:48 Edward C. Holmes

I can't read this. Is there anything of note in it: https://www.wsj.com/articles/intelligence-on-sick-staff-at-wuhan-lab-fuels-debate-on-covid-19-origin-11621796228
2021-05-23 18:07 Kristian G. Andersen open

Nope, it's _exactly_ the same as previously reported - NO new information.
2021-05-23 18:11 Edward C. Holmes open

Thought so. If 3 staff were sick enough to go to hospital then any outbreak at WIV must have been substantial.
2021-05-23 18:16 Edward C. Holmes open

And of course, the molecular clock dates put the origin of the virus back to September or so
2021-05-23 18:16 Robert F. Garry open

I'll send in the morning (i have to be on the University network to get full access).

Full conversation →