Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.854 [SLACK_001068] · slack_pm:msg:08880

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Indeed. Doesn't take much to think that any particular RBD+FCS combination could arise. Nature does it again.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
Doesn't take much to think that any particular RBD+FCS combination could arise.	own voice, substantive	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

Doesn't take much to think that any particular RBD+FCS combination could arise.

own voice, substantive

speaker_own

asserts

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-21 16:50 Edward C. Holmes open

Let the show begin...
2021-05-21 16:52 Kristian G. Andersen open

Eddie, the lab leak theory isn't a conspiracy theory, you know? Just so that's clear...
2021-05-21 16:53 Edward C. Holmes open

Sorry, I keep forgetting...
2021-05-21 16:53 Kristian G. Andersen open

I know. It's easy to forget. Separately - fucking hell, these viruses - SO MUCH DIVERSITY!!!!!!!!!!
2021-05-21 16:59 Edward C. Holmes

Indeed. Doesn't take much to think that any particular RBD+FCS combination could arise. Nature does it again.
2021-05-21 17:16 Kristian G. Andersen open

Nah. I had bookmarked that BioProject previously so I just came across it.
2021-05-21 17:16 Edward C. Holmes open

Ah yes, I remember now.
2021-05-21 17:17 Kristian G. Andersen open

But yeah - I _could_ have waited ten minutes... Others found the paper before me though
2021-05-21 17:18 Edward C. Holmes open

Jonathan Eisen is a stand-up guy on this.