Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.826 [SLACK_001040] · slack_pm:msg:08610

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yes, happy to do that.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-17 13:19 Robert F. Garry open

Exactly I did the best I could with them - Relman, Alina, eDim the whole circus got to weigh in.
2021-05-17 13:29 Edward C. Holmes open

This is all still the fall-out from Science thing. Nothing new. That's why we need to do the evidence based doc. Don't get me started on Butt Lesion...he just craves attention and will say anything to get it. He told the BBC/PBSfilmmaker that he knew about COVID in mid December. There are so many stories of the dirt he has done. I wonder what Daszak thinks?
2021-05-17 13:38 Edward C. Holmes open

Perhaps we can write send an Erratum to Nature saying his name was added by mistake and should be removed?
2021-05-17 13:59 Kristian G. Andersen open

Butt Lesion will regret this - he's going to look like the biggest idiot. Yes, need to nail down the evidence doc. Should we have a call to discuss - we 100% need this and probably soon.
2021-05-17 14:10 Edward C. Holmes

Yes, happy to do that.
2021-05-17 14:18 Kristian G. Andersen open

How about Thursday? Earliest time that works Down under.
2021-05-17 14:19 Edward C. Holmes open

So Friday morning my time? Yes, I can do that.
2021-05-17 14:21 Andrew Rambaut open

I could make that I think.
2021-05-17 14:25 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah. How about this? https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20210520T200000&p1=2 40&p2=136&p3=178&p4=770 [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-17 at 14.25.12.png]