Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.815 [SLACK_001029] · slack_pm:msg:08498

Date: 2021-05-14 19:18
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

One would think SARS-CoV-2 would have been in that 2019 thesis had they had SARS-CoV-2 in the lab.... It's just extremely dumb - and Alex is very very good at laying that bare. Jesse went on about these "missing viruses" too - I pointed out to him that they are nowhere near SARS-CoV-2 and totally irrelevant as it pertains to the origin. I think he might have ignored me.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-14 18:07 Kristian G. Andersen open

E.g., [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-14 at 6.00.45 PM.png]
2021-05-14 18:08 Kristian G. Andersen open

shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-14 at 6.08.43 PM.png
2021-05-14 18:22 Kristian G. Andersen open

And this very key point - which was Zhengli's point too... I wish more people would understand this. https://twitter.com/acritschristoph/status/1392556682157326336?s=20
2021-05-14 18:28 Edward C. Holmes open

He's a super-star. I noticed all that stuff about Rs8561 etc. the other day. No where near SARS-CoV-2. All this searching online and they have found nothing closer than RaTG13. I wonder why.
2021-05-14 19:18 Kristian G. Andersen

One would think SARS-CoV-2 would have been in that 2019 thesis had they had SARS-CoV-2 in the lab.... It's just extremely dumb - and Alex is very very good at laying that bare. Jesse went on about these "missing viruses" too - I pointed out to him that they are nowhere near SARS-CoV-2 and totally irrelevant as it pertains to the origin. I think he might have ignored me.

Full conversation →