Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.797 [SLACK_001011] · slack_pm:msg:08285

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Please tell me something is TOTALLY wrong with this. (I saw the fantastic discussion a few days ago)

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-13 13:34 Andrew Rambaut open

I am now glad we got him on the origins paper - makes him look like a swithering idiot.
2021-05-13 14:10 Andrew Rambaut open

Currently dealing with the shit show that is B.1.617.2 (it is always the lineages with 1s and 7s in it). Might be a bitpreoccupied for a bit.
2021-05-13 14:10 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, I mean [shared file(s): E1P6mJmWQAEg1sz.png]
2021-05-13 14:11 Andrew Rambaut open

Yeah - but as always it isn't as simple as that.
2021-05-13 14:11 Kristian G. Andersen

Please tell me something is TOTALLY wrong with this. (I saw the fantastic discussion a few days ago)
2021-05-13 14:11 Andrew Rambaut open

The india data is hugely difficult to interpret at the morent
2021-05-13 14:11 Kristian G. Andersen open

Nope, definitely not as simple as that - and clearly there's a bias here. However...
2021-05-13 14:11 Kristian G. Andersen open

Difficult enough to the point that we have to ignore it for now?
2021-05-13 14:12 Andrew Rambaut open

B.1.617.2 (and .1) are very diverse suggesting quite an old origin (perhaps July last year).