Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.781 [SLACK_000995] · slack_pm:msg:08139

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Honestly, it's embarrassing - "as scientists with relevant experience". Lol.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-11 17:07 Edward C. Holmes open

Just got this from Dominic - spot-on "I like the comment on balance related to the number of pages - perhaps if there were 40 rather than 4/313 pages then all would be OK. The authors miss many points - the WHO was not an 'investigation', but a study of origins; that even if a lab leak it is still an animal source; an external forensic examination of a lab would never be acceptable in China/Russia/US/UK etc; the lab hypothesis is not excluded inthe report, just ranked lower than the others. I don't know him, but surprised Ralph Baric signed it given his research. I'm a bit sick of the 'independent oversight' and 'broad expertise' jibes also."
2021-05-11 17:08 Kristian G. Andersen open

100% spot on.
2021-05-11 17:10 Edward C. Holmes open

Pretty extraordinary that Science are letting this through.
2021-05-11 17:11 Kristian G. Andersen

Honestly, it's embarrassing - "as scientists with relevant experience". Lol.