Private channel session 1357

4 messages over 3m, 2021-05-11 – 2021-05-11.

A “conversation” here is an activity session — a run of messages with under 60 minutes of silence inside it. The channel had no native conversation boundaries.

1. 2021-05-11 17:07 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.780
   Just got this from Dominic - spot-on "I like the comment on balance related to the number of pages - perhaps if there were 40 rather than 4/313 pages then all would be OK. The authors miss many points - the WHO was not an 'investigation', but a study of origins; that even if a lab leak it is still an animal source; an external forensic examination of a lab would never be acceptable in China/Russia/US/UK etc; the lab hypothesis is not excluded inthe report, just ranked lower than the others. I don't know him, but surprised Ralph Baric signed it given his research. I'm a bit sick of the 'independent oversight' and 'broad expertise' jibes also."
2. 2021-05-11 17:08 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.781
   100% spot on.
3. 2021-05-11 17:10 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.781
   Pretty extraordinary that Science are letting this through.
4. 2021-05-11 17:11 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.781
   Honestly, it's embarrassing - "as scientists with relevant experience". Lol.