Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.762 [SLACK_000976] · slack_pm:msg:07974

Date: 2021-05-07 16:23
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Have any of you read the Wade article in a little more detail? I'm still going through it, but it's shockingly bad - Imean, almost every single paragraph contains complete falsehoods and misunderstandings(/representations?) ofbasic scientific concepts. I only skimmed it previously, but reading through this, I'm totally stumped. It's as if he has never read a biology book.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-07 16:23 Kristian G. Andersen

Have any of you read the Wade article in a little more detail? I'm still going through it, but it's shockingly bad - Imean, almost every single paragraph contains complete falsehoods and misunderstandings(/representations?) ofbasic scientific concepts. I only skimmed it previously, but reading through this, I'm totally stumped. It's as if he has never read a biology book.
2021-05-07 16:47 Edward C. Holmes open

I tried, but it made me so angry that I could literally feel my blood pressure begin to rise to dangerous levels so I hadto stop. I just can't read this shit otherwise it will kill me. Baltimore's quote is hilarious. I bet he was on the phone with Jesse.
2021-05-07 16:49 Kristian G. Andersen open

I'm honestly laughing reading this - it's completely absurd.
2021-05-07 16:49 Kristian G. Andersen open

It's dangerous though - I mean: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-07 at 4.48.22 PM.png]
2021-05-07 16:50 Kristian G. Andersen open

shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-07 at 4.49.59 PM.png

Full conversation →