Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.754 [SLACK_000968] · slack_pm:msg:07892

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

It is a lie. It's meant to distract. It's also easier than arguing the science.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-05 15:48 Edward C. Holmes open

Daszak is a total charlatan BUT I'd certain he would have known about what was being done at WIV and it talking tohim I'm 100% certain he has no knowledge of anything of note at the WIV. Either that or he's the best liar ever withballs is titanium.
2021-05-05 15:48 Kristian G. Andersen open

First time I heard the PBS interview with Relman - did he actually _read_ the report?
2021-05-05 15:51 Edward C. Holmes open

He clearly never looked at the Annexes.
2021-05-05 15:52 Kristian G. Andersen open

Nope. If people want to disagree with the conclusions, data, or methodology, fine - but to say that there's "no data" very clearly shows that somebody didn't actually look at the report. It's flat out false.
2021-05-05 16:28 Robert F. Garry

It is a lie. It's meant to distract. It's also easier than arguing the science.