A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
It would be good to get some comments from people who aren't us - though.
-
THat's a real good idea. Maybe some of these folks: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32700664/
-
This comment from Daszak is the key one:
-
• *Dr. Peter Daszak:* • Yes, I have been speaking to them for 15 years. If they had found a virus that was high, of high interest that they were working on, they would have told me before the outbreak, because that's what we were doing before the outbreak.• We shared information on a weekly basis. Yes, some of them answer up the party chain, but they also are scientists. If there is something that the intelligence agencies know that they could supply to the WHO team, they would supply it and we will look at that.
-
2021-05-05 15:48
Edward C. Holmes
Daszak is a total charlatan BUT I'd certain he would have known about what was being done at WIV and it talking tohim I'm 100% certain he has no knowledge of anything of note at the WIV. Either that or he's the best liar ever withballs is titanium.
-
First time I heard the PBS interview with Relman - did he actually _read_ the report?
-
He clearly never looked at the Annexes.
-
Nope. If people want to disagree with the conclusions, data, or methodology, fine - but to say that there's "no data" very clearly shows that somebody didn't actually look at the report. It's flat out false.
-
It is a lie. It's meant to distract. It's also easier than arguing the science.