Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.751 [SLACK_000965] · slack_pm:msg:07869

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Would definitely be interesting to see it. Don't like the passive aggressive bit about the UK papers breaking theembargo.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-05-05 14:19 Kristian G. Andersen open

This should be interesting [shared file(s): upcoming letter]
2021-05-05 14:29 Edward C. Holmes

Would definitely be interesting to see it. Don't like the passive aggressive bit about the UK papers breaking theembargo.
2021-05-05 14:32 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, I don't know what that embargo comment was about... I don't expect much from the letter - probably the same uninformed speculation Relman put in PNAS. Which would be very disappointing.
2021-05-05 14:33 Kristian G. Andersen open

If they focus it on "... but they were working in mines and there's this weird FCS", I swear to God, I will not be gentle.Not a good career move on my end if it comes to that, but if it's the same old speculation with no science, well, so beit.
2021-05-05 14:35 Edward C. Holmes open

I can't think there will be any new science. Would could there be. I bet it will be about the 8 mystery sequences. I'llscream if it rattles on about RaTG13.
2021-05-05 14:37 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, there's no scientific basis, so I'm curious - I'm all for "keeping our eyes open", but not if they justify that aninvestigation must be done because of e.g., RaTG13. We'll see. Kinda funny this'll be in journal called "Science".... :wink: