Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.675 [SLACK_000889] · slack_pm:msg:07075

Date: 2021-04-05 07:36
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry
Topics: Vaccines

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

This is a very good article. "While most vaccines are effective against B.1.1.7, researchers are increasingly concerned about other variants that contain a mutation called E484K. (Scientists often refer to it, appropriately, as"Eek.")" Eek going mainstream! I guess some will complain about "inclusion." Gonna need some variants for: yikes,dang [better than DouG] and damn.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
"While most vaccines are effective against B.1.1.7, researchers are increasingly concerned about other variants that contain a mutation called E484K.	quoted / not their view	quoted_external inside quotation marks	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

"While most vaccines are effective against B.1.1.7, researchers are increasingly concerned about other variants that contain a mutation called E484K.

quoted / not their view

quoted_external inside quotation marks

asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-04-05 06:58 Kristian G. Andersen open

"Jeopardized my prospects in science". I bloody hope so!
2021-04-05 07:17 Robert F. Garry open

Honestly. I'd advise her to find another career. If your first inclination when you find someone disagrees with you isto contact the journal and claim fraud, science is probably not the gig for you. Second, if you think you can wade intoan area with no background, write a BS paper (that is wrong on many counts) and then believe that your "opinion" is*equa*l to ppl who have dedicated decades of study of similar problems, then you are too ~fucked up in the head~ stupid to be in science.
2021-04-05 07:29 Robert F. Garry open

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/03/health/coronavirus-variants-vaccines.html?referringSource=articleShare
2021-04-05 07:36 Robert F. Garry

This is a very good article. "While most vaccines are effective against B.1.1.7, researchers are increasingly concerned about other variants that contain a mutation called E484K. (Scientists often refer to it, appropriately, as"Eek.")" Eek going mainstream! I guess some will complain about "inclusion." Gonna need some variants for: yikes,dang [better than DouG] and damn.

Full conversation →