Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.675 [SLACK_000889] · slack_pm:msg:07074

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/03/health/coronavirus-variants-vaccines.html?referringSource=articleShare

Links shared

news https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/03/health/coronavirus-variants-vaccines.html?referringSource=articleShare

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-04-05 06:58 Kristian G. Andersen open

"Jeopardized my prospects in science". I bloody hope so!
2021-04-05 07:17 Robert F. Garry open

Honestly. I'd advise her to find another career. If your first inclination when you find someone disagrees with you isto contact the journal and claim fraud, science is probably not the gig for you. Second, if you think you can wade intoan area with no background, write a BS paper (that is wrong on many counts) and then believe that your "opinion" is*equa*l to ppl who have dedicated decades of study of similar problems, then you are too ~fucked up in the head~ stupid to be in science.
2021-04-05 07:29 Robert F. Garry

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/03/health/coronavirus-variants-vaccines.html?referringSource=articleShare
2021-04-05 07:36 Robert F. Garry open

This is a very good article. "While most vaccines are effective against B.1.1.7, researchers are increasingly concerned about other variants that contain a mutation called E484K. (Scientists often refer to it, appropriately, as"Eek.")" Eek going mainstream! I guess some will complain about "inclusion." Gonna need some variants for: yikes,dang [better than DouG] and damn.