Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.645 [SLACK_000859] · slack_pm:msg:06762

Date: 2021-03-27 17:02
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yes, I think we do - because with the WHO report coming out, chances are well be hammering hard on the market. I'll play around with some stuff later too.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-27 16:58 Andrew Rambaut open

OK - returning to this thread from Dec last year: https://andersenlab.slack.com/archives/GTGL6LY5C/p1607277127336700
2021-03-27 16:59 Andrew Rambaut open

Do we want to pursue this a bit more? Perhaps have something ready for the WHO report drop?
2021-03-27 17:02 Kristian G. Andersen

Yes, I think we do - because with the WHO report coming out, chances are well be hammering hard on the market. I'll play around with some stuff later too.
2021-03-27 17:02 Andrew Rambaut open

We have a number of haplotypes that are definitely in Wuhan in Jan 2020 but I think only 3 with multiple instances (there are ones with a few unique mutations) - A (WH04 etc), B (Wuhan-Hu-1) and WA1 - we could root on each ofthese and do a beast tree and see which fits best.
2021-03-27 17:04 Andrew Rambaut open

Test significance of being 1 base closer to RaTG13 - is it just chance? a reversion?
2021-03-27 17:05 Kristian G. Andersen open

Worth (possible?) to test if midpoint fits the early data best too?
2021-03-27 17:08 Andrew Rambaut open

I can't see anything obvious in that Tanzanian one - just lots of convergent stuff as you say. I assume they are 3connected cases so probably some chronic case?

Full conversation →