COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.619 [SLACK_000833] · slack_pm:msg:06479

Page text: p.619 · original PDF

Date
2021-03-23 06:12
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Shows how modular the spike is though.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-03-23 05:38 Robert F. Garry open
    Plausible - Indel Region 2 and 3 - very divergent between SC2 and GDpangocov.
  2. 2021-03-23 05:39 Robert F. Garry open
    NTD is the receptor binding domain of many CoVs.
  3. 2021-03-23 05:43 Robert F. Garry open
    Not on this topic but related to "the Plan." Spoke with Betsy McKay again late yesterday- reading between the lines Ibelieve that our friend "Deep Throat" has surfaced again. She was aware of the email exchanges back in January -hinted that they had been shared with her from someone on the calls that thought "we" were a bit overly friendly tothe lab leak.
  4. 2021-03-23 05:47 Robert F. Garry open
    Back to the interesting paper - important to keep in mind that enhanced replication in cell culture doesn't necessarilytranslate to enhanced pathogenesis. As Andrew you've noted - it's all about the timing...
  5. 2021-03-23 06:12 Andrew Rambaut
    Shows how modular the spike is though.
  6. 2021-03-23 06:56 Kristian G. Andersen open
    @Andrew Rambaut Never saw that money from the institution. Bastards.
  7. 2021-03-23 07:00 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I think people are majorly underestimating how flexible and mutational tolerant the spike is.
  8. 2021-03-23 07:37 Robert F. Garry open
    @Andrew Rambaut Rich bastards! :grinning:
  9. 2021-03-23 07:50 Kristian G. Andersen open
    ... as for Ralph DeepThroat, I don't think he's realizing that this actually helps us... Yes, as we said, we considereda lab leak a very real and serious possibility, no, that does not change our conclusions [add new stuff from WHO report].

Full conversation →