Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-03-22 10:08 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Twitter is on fire with scientists pushing for the lab leak theory too. Unlike everybody else, we can just sit and wait for that report and then amplify the message...
2. 2021-03-22 10:20 Kristian G. Andersen open
   ".... deserves intelligent discussion" [Links to tweet about bioweapons programs] [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-03-22 at 10.17.02.png]
3. 2021-03-22 10:23 Andrew Rambaut open
   Major mistake by WHO not getting that report out
4. 2021-03-22 10:46 Robert F. Garry open
   Crap and bullshit are hard to counter with calm dispassionate science. Very disappointed that when faced with Alina's wall of crazy and it's DISINFORMATION that Jessie shrugs and calls discussion of SC2 as a "vaccine for abioweapon" "deserved intelligent discussion." This is playing with fire. Move beyond politics my ass. If Trump were still President there is a very good chance - based on today's discussion and editorials in two major US"newspapers" that he and Pompeo would have already started military action against China.
5. 2021-03-22 10:59 Robert F. Garry
   Bush II had way less "evidence" than this for taking out Saddam Hussein.
6. 2021-03-22 11:00 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Like Iraq, the US is now just making up evidence to suit their agenda. Hard evidence apparently not required - and alot of prominent scientists seem to agree. Kinda sad, really.
7. 2021-03-22 11:11 Robert F. Garry open
   The prominent scientists - like JB and ML - agreeing is the problem. Hard to dismiss them purely as cranks, but it's their bad priors in the way. Which leads me to suggest that this is pretty serious - WHO needs to consider releasing it's report immediately - either that or someone in the know needs to leak the story about Eddie's raccoon dogs and the grate.

Full conversation →