Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.586 [SLACK_000800] · slack_pm:msg:06127

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Good letter. This whole debate will shift after the WHO report is released. I'm not exactly sure how, but we will entera new phase?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-11 10:44 Edward C. Holmes open

Yup, that's the Parisite Plan - no work allowed. They clearly sent their letter to newspapers all over the world.
2021-03-11 10:44 Robert F. Garry open

Good advice [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-03-11 10:46 Kristian G. Andersen open

Oh wow, reasonable people actually still exist? That's cool.
2021-03-11 10:47 Edward C. Holmes

Good letter. This whole debate will shift after the WHO report is released. I'm not exactly sure how, but we will entera new phase?
2021-03-11 10:50 Kristian G. Andersen open

If they have the 'grate' data in there I think we should forcefully come out and make it clear that this is over - the evidence is clear. This is exactly the type of evidence that we have been looking for and we need to push hard todiscredit people like Alina as conspiracy theorists - because that's clearly what it becomes if WHO has additional data. We have been too gentle on those accounts up until now.
2021-03-11 10:50 Kristian G. Andersen open

I might also chose to call out the Broad for "lending credibility to fringe theories".
2021-03-11 10:51 Robert F. Garry open

I've been doodling: [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-03-11 10:52 Kristian G. Andersen open

Nice - yes, we should definitely expand on this. Once that WHO report is out, I think we might want to get towards publication of PO2. Let's have a Zoom call after the report is out. To be clear - IMO PO2 wouldn't need to consider anything that has to do with a lab.