Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.584 [SLACK_000798] · slack_pm:msg:06106

Date: 2021-03-10 14:21
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I mean - they should have come across recombination by now if they actually cared about looking at this properly... But I guess that was never the purpose.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-10 14:12 Kristian G. Andersen open

Sufficiently snarky - so yes.
2021-03-10 14:14 Edward C. Holmes open

Done. I didn't reply because I have blocked this nutter, but I pasted that tweet in.
2021-03-10 14:15 Kristian G. Andersen open

:fire:
2021-03-10 14:19 Edward C. Holmes open

She is so spectacularly dumb. They just don't understand the basic biology of what they are talking about.
2021-03-10 14:21 Kristian G. Andersen

I mean - they should have come across recombination by now if they actually cared about looking at this properly... But I guess that was never the purpose.
2021-03-10 14:23 Andrew Rambaut open

Found some lovely examples of recombinants between B.1.1.7 and other lineages: [shared file(s): group4_snp_plot.png]
2021-03-10 14:24 Andrew Rambaut open

Perhaps that is lab made too?
2021-03-10 14:31 Edward C. Holmes open

You can't argue with people so dumb.
2021-03-10 14:34 Kristian G. Andersen open

Interesting recombinants - Andrew, do you have an automated way to detect these? We have seen some strange sequences lately.

Full conversation →