Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.583 [SLACK_000797] · slack_pm:msg:06088

Date: 2021-03-10 07:00
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry
Topics: Lab-leak / accidental release hypothesis

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

And yes - will make the lab leak/tinfoil hat crowd's heads collectively explode. I can hear it now - it's all just circumstantial evidence, not proof, etc. Most of the early cases from the market - coincidence unlikely - likely tellingus a whole lot.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
And yes - will make the lab leak/tinfoil hat crowd's heads collectively explode.	own voice, substantive	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

And yes - will make the lab leak/tinfoil hat crowd's heads collectively explode.

own voice, substantive

speaker_own

asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-10 07:00 Robert F. Garry

And yes - will make the lab leak/tinfoil hat crowd's heads collectively explode. I can hear it now - it's all just circumstantial evidence, not proof, etc. Most of the early cases from the market - coincidence unlikely - likely tellingus a whole lot.

Full conversation →