Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.564 [SLACK_000778] · slack_pm:msg:05893

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I also talked to Amy Maxmen at Nature - apparently she's also on to something -

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-03 15:43 Edward C. Holmes open

Aw, bless. I hope Betsy doesn't put the rattle back into the pram.
2021-03-03 15:49 Kristian G. Andersen open

I'm not hopeful. I don't trust Betsy, and more broadly speaking, WSJ.
2021-03-03 15:50 Edward C. Holmes open

I'm with you there.
2021-03-03 15:51 Robert F. Garry open

Always good to be cautious....
2021-03-03 15:54 Robert F. Garry

I also talked to Amy Maxmen at Nature - apparently she's also on to something -
2021-03-03 15:55 Kristian G. Andersen open

About origins? Amy is good, but some of her stuff is shaky - and her background knowledge can be quite limited attimes (I talked to her about Ebola a long time ago and I was shocked by how little she knew, given that she has written so much about it). But I think she can be trusted - so that's a big plus!
2021-03-03 16:01 Robert F. Garry open

Yeah sorta origins...she might do a podcast...
2021-03-03 16:11 Kristian G. Andersen open

I think we need the Bob Garry podcast. It's fine we don't have Twitter Garry, but I think the world definitely needs Podcast Garry... Like that German dude.
2021-03-03 16:34 Edward C. Holmes open

Oh, I agree!