COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.559 [SLACK_000773] · slack_pm:msg:05834

Page text: p.559 · original PDF

Date
2021-03-01 15:00
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I am not sure 'misrepresents' more than completely ignores.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-03-01 14:57 Edward C. Holmes open
    This should be pointed out. I'm very disappointed with Nick Goldman as he tried to defend all this. I got my name removed from the Email chains.
  2. 2021-03-01 14:58 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Too harsh? [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-03-01 at 14.58.38.png]
  3. 2021-03-01 14:59 Kristian G. Andersen open
    (not posted yet)
  4. 2021-03-01 15:00 Edward C. Holmes open
    Nope
  5. 2021-03-01 15:00 Andrew Rambaut
    I am not sure 'misrepresents' more than completely ignores.
  6. 2021-03-01 15:00 Kristian G. Andersen open
    "Ignores" - better.
  7. 2021-03-01 15:01 Edward C. Holmes open
    Yes indeed
  8. 2021-03-01 15:04 Andrew Rambaut open
    I can just imagine the cringy reply about how everyone worked super hard.
  9. 2021-03-01 15:05 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Hah - there's no going back from this other than a full retraction. This is embarrassing beyond belief.

Full conversation →