Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.558 [SLACK_000772] · slack_pm:msg:05824

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

"We will *for sure* address this". Sure. Great emails Eddie - this is embarrassing beyond belief - in Nature, no less.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-01 14:37 Edward C. Holmes open

Here are some of my emails: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-03-02 at 9.36.14 am.png]
2021-03-01 14:37 Kristian G. Andersen open

The best example they could come up with.
2021-03-01 14:38 Edward C. Holmes open

And another. This is like a freedom of information act request: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-03-02 at 9.38.02am.png]
2021-03-01 14:39 Edward C. Holmes open

The whole thing is complete and embarrassing shit.
2021-03-01 14:39 Kristian G. Andersen

"We will *for sure* address this". Sure. Great emails Eddie - this is embarrassing beyond belief - in Nature, no less.
2021-03-01 14:41 Edward C. Holmes open

They were so transfixed on getting it into Nature that they didn't see what they were doing.
2021-03-01 14:41 Kristian G. Andersen open

And good choice taking yourself off the paper - I did the same on Charles' paper too because he wouldn't listen tosense either. Some scientists are so full of themselves by now - but this has to be the worst example I have seen.
2021-03-01 14:50 Edward C. Holmes open

Just so my emails make sense, the text that I am commenting on stated that UK govt policy was based on Emma's tweet. At the very least the corresponding authors need to be told this is insulting.
2021-03-01 14:52 Andrew Rambaut open

Yeah - we wrote a report which went in to the SoS