COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.545 [SLACK_000759] · slack_pm:msg:05683

Page text: p.545 · original PDF

Date
2021-02-24 09:29
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

HMMMM - that is interesting.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-02-24 09:02 Robert F. Garry open
    @Andrew Rambaut Q957R is interesting - Q957 probably forms a salt bridge with K304. Put another positive charge there make clash and likely "loosens up" the monomer more than a bit. Like Eddies corridor analogy though - variants finding their way down to a common path,
  2. 2021-02-24 09:22 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, B.1.526 with eek is definitely rising in New York. This might be real. https://outbreak.info/situation-reports?country=United%20States&division=California[...]1.526&muts=S%3 AE484K&selected=New%20York&selectedType=division
  3. 2021-02-24 09:27 Robert F. Garry open
    Speaking of the WSJ - they just requested an interview to discuss our Virological post.
  4. 2021-02-24 09:27 Andrew Rambaut open
    It is weird the V701A reverting in the S477N lineage - maybe the tree is wrong
  5. 2021-02-24 09:29 Robert F. Garry
    HMMMM - that is interesting.
  6. 2021-02-24 09:29 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Oh... We have identified a MAJOR issue with Illumina's consensus caller - it's calling reference calls if there are _any_ mismatching reads at a variant site. That might be why
  7. 2021-02-24 09:29 Kristian G. Andersen open
    If this is from NYC, it's possible they used Illumina's DRAGEN pipeline
  8. 2021-02-24 09:29 Kristian G. Andersen open
    (I have reached out to them - crickets).
  9. 2021-02-24 09:30 Kristian G. Andersen open
    shared file(s): image (1).png, Screen Shot 2021-02-24 at 09.30.29.png

Full conversation →