Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.543 [SLACK_000757] · slack_pm:msg:05665

Date: 2021-02-24 01:35
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Thanks. Collins is a good point and I can see people picking up on that. One clause for non-release is that they'expose people to serious harm or intimidation' and given that we are bound to get online abuse for this (even though the emails are innocuous) I think the Uni may opt not to release the emails because they have a duty of care over my mental health. Their call though.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-02-24 01:15 Andrew Rambaut open

@Eddie Holmes I just got the final FOI document to check over. An interesting read and comes across as a genuineinvestigation (as it was, of course) with no prior agenda. Interesting it drags in Jeremy as a key player. Also shows Collins had eyes on it (but only in retrospect). I can't see anything I personally should be concerned about (which iswhat UoS was asking about) so unless there is anything you want to draw my attention to, I will sign off on it.
2021-02-24 01:35 Edward C. Holmes

Thanks. Collins is a good point and I can see people picking up on that. One clause for non-release is that they'expose people to serious harm or intimidation' and given that we are bound to get online abuse for this (even though the emails are innocuous) I think the Uni may opt not to release the emails because they have a duty of care over my mental health. Their call though.

Full conversation →