Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.541 [SLACK_000755] · slack_pm:msg:05636

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I don't believe that 'variant' is doing anything special.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
I don't believe that 'variant' is doing anything special.	needs context	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

I don't believe that 'variant' is doing anything special.

needs context

speaker_own

asserts

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-02-22 12:33 Robert F. Garry open

Hilarious!
2021-02-22 12:35 Robert F. Garry open

An editor with a sense of humor...
2021-02-22 13:26 Kristian G. Andersen open

Haha, _we_ should sign him up.
2021-02-22 13:29 Kristian G. Andersen open

Speaking of which - here's Charles' paper on the "California" variant.... (I asked for our group to be taken off - I'm concerned about the robustness of some of the analyses/conclusions to say the least). [shared file(s): L452R-variant-manuscript-ver4.pdf]
2021-02-22 13:52 Andrew Rambaut

I don't believe that 'variant' is doing anything special.
2021-02-22 13:54 Robert F. Garry open

Agree - Good choice Kristian.
2021-02-22 13:56 Kristian G. Andersen open

I _think_ it might be slightly more transmissible, but I'm not even sure about that. For the rest, well :man-shrugging:.Doesn't matter though - B.1.1.7 will knock it out within the next few weeks.
2021-02-22 13:57 Andrew Rambaut open

Go B.1.1.7!
2021-02-22 13:59 Robert F. Garry open

Absolutely!