Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.486 [SLACK_000700] · slack_pm:msg:05062

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I don't think they even accepted human-to-human transmission until about Jan 22nd.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-02-05 13:53 Edward C. Holmes open

@Andrew Rambaut I'm just treating all this as background noise to be ignored. I never look at these people on Twitter and I bet there are others we don't even know about.
2021-02-05 14:00 Robert F. Garry open

@Andrew Rambaut YOU are a wise man Eddie!
2021-02-05 14:38 Edward C. Holmes open

Found this one from Jan 5th. Somewhat prescient. I wouldn't mind this being released in a freedom of information act: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-02-06 at 9.36.10 am.png]
2021-02-05 14:38 Kristian G. Andersen open

"very bad". No shit.
2021-02-05 14:40 Edward C. Holmes

I don't think they even accepted human-to-human transmission until about Jan 22nd.
2021-02-05 14:42 Robert F. Garry open

This is amazing - On another note - I uploaded a leaner version of the bat CoV post. Much more subtle.
2021-02-05 14:43 Edward C. Holmes open

Great, I'll take a look.
2021-02-05 14:57 Robert F. Garry open

Fig.1 updated
2021-02-05 14:57 Robert F. Garry open

shared file(s): image.png