Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.485 [SLACK_000699] · slack_pm:msg:05057

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

@Andrew Rambaut Indeed, so tiresome. The way they twist the story is yet more evidence that the "Science Police" force is highly corrupt.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-02-05 13:08 Edward C. Holmes open

@Andrew Rambaut Fortunately Zhang does not like to use email
2021-02-05 13:13 Robert F. Garry open

@Andrew Rambaut This timeline needs to be public (to the extent that it isn't already). Agree that the No H2H transmission BS cost lives. So did the this is not an airborne virus BS, but that is another story.
2021-02-05 13:13 Robert F. Garry open

@Andrew Rambaut FOIA - a doubled edged sword....
2021-02-05 13:20 Edward C. Holmes open

@Andrew Rambaut I've explained all this a number of times. I think that BBC doco covers a lot of this.
2021-02-05 13:44 Robert F. Garry

@Andrew Rambaut Indeed, so tiresome. The way they twist the story is yet more evidence that the "Science Police" force is highly corrupt.
2021-02-05 13:53 Edward C. Holmes open

@Andrew Rambaut I'm just treating all this as background noise to be ignored. I never look at these people on Twitter and I bet there are others we don't even know about.
2021-02-05 14:00 Robert F. Garry open

@Andrew Rambaut YOU are a wise man Eddie!
2021-02-05 14:38 Edward C. Holmes open

Found this one from Jan 5th. Somewhat prescient. I wouldn't mind this being released in a freedom of information act: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-02-06 at 9.36.10 am.png]
2021-02-05 14:38 Kristian G. Andersen open

"very bad". No shit.