COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.485 [SLACK_000699] · slack_pm:msg:05051

Page text: p.485 · original PDF

Date
2021-02-05 13:04
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

@Andrew Rambaut I should email you about this so you can lay it all out for for a future FoI.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-02-05 12:52 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Oh, I missed this beauty from the Science Police. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-02-05 at 12.50.04.png]
  2. 2021-02-05 12:54 Edward C. Holmes open
    I think he's talking about his own work at the end.
  3. 2021-02-05 12:56 Edward C. Holmes open
    No, the reviewer did review the paper but also said it was a good idea to release the sequence.
  4. 2021-02-05 13:02 Andrew Rambaut open
    @Andrew Rambaut i think it was George's paper in that case.
  5. 2021-02-05 13:04 Andrew Rambaut
    @Andrew Rambaut I should email you about this so you can lay it all out for for a future FoI.
  6. 2021-02-05 13:05 Andrew Rambaut open
    @Andrew Rambaut "Eddie, can you just remind me what really happened?"
  7. 2021-02-05 13:08 Edward C. Holmes open
    @Andrew Rambaut Fortunately Zhang does not like to use email
  8. 2021-02-05 13:13 Robert F. Garry open
    @Andrew Rambaut This timeline needs to be public (to the extent that it isn't already). Agree that the No H2H transmission BS cost lives. So did the this is not an airborne virus BS, but that is another story.
  9. 2021-02-05 13:13 Robert F. Garry open
    @Andrew Rambaut FOIA - a doubled edged sword....

Full conversation →