Chat message
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.448 [SLACK_000662] · slack_pm:msg:04642
Page text: p.448 · original PDF
- Date
- 2021-01-25 07:57
- Type
- chat message · slack
- mentioned
- Kristian G. Andersen
- recipient
- Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
- speaker
- Robert F. Garry
Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.
@Kristian Andersen the R214C and G261C are *definitely* forming a new cysteine bridge. They are close enough in
the structure that they WILL shift around to make the bridge. The existing disulfide bonds are C12 - C136, C131C166, C291 -C301. C12 is [apparently] the N -terminus and C12 to up to the orange A26 is "disordered" and therefore not in the structure I used to model spike. There is a newer structure (unstabilized cryo that gets the wholen terminus, including an N17) - I need to redo that models for sure putting in C12. I might even update some of the Virological Figures. Unpaired cysteines are *very rare* in viral glycoproteins. ALL the sarbecovirus spike cysteines are completely conserved from RmYN02, other Bat Covs, Pango Covs thru SARS-CoV to SC2. THIS IS HIGHLY UNUSUAL, BUT ULTRACOOL. Need to look at other CoVS to see the C-C structures in NTD. The role of NTD inSARS CoVs definately understudied. [shared file(s): image.png]