COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.405 [SLACK_000619] · slack_pm:msg:04180

Page text: p.405 · original PDF

Date
2021-01-15 15:39
Type
chat message · slack
mentioned
Edward C. Holmes, Kristian G. Andersen
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

But actually the trying to get an incriminating email is an interesting thought. @Eddie Holmes, @Kristian Andersen did you get this?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-01-15 15:30 Andrew Rambaut open
    What do we reckon - a fishing attempt to hack my account? I am sure is a legit email: [shared file(s): image.png]
  2. 2021-01-15 15:36 Robert F. Garry open
    It seems more specific than random phishing. They are definitely targeting you in particular. My guess: someone wearing a tinfoil hat looking to entrap you into some sort of response that will look like you're open to a bribe from the CCP. Maybe you should inquire if the offer includes a "honeypot?"
  3. 2021-01-15 15:37 Robert F. Garry open
    Maybe 2.
  4. 2021-01-15 15:38 Andrew Rambaut open
    I hadn't thought of that - I was thinking more of the one I heard about where they give you a fake zoom or teams link which ends up giving them access to your system.
  5. 2021-01-15 15:39 Andrew Rambaut
    But actually the trying to get an incriminating email is an interesting thought. @Eddie Holmes, @Kristian Andersen did you get this?
  6. 2021-01-15 15:39 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I don't know man - enquire about the excellent honorarium first...
  7. 2021-01-15 15:40 Kristian G. Andersen open
    ... I didn't receive it.
  8. 2021-01-15 15:40 Andrew Rambaut open
    Perhaps say they have to pay the honorarium first into my paypal and then I have some excellent dirt about Holmes and Andersen
  9. 2021-01-15 15:41 Kristian G. Andersen open
    That's worth at least a hundred grand!

Full conversation →