Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.397 [SLACK_000611] · slack_pm:msg:04102

Date: 2021-01-14 13:30
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I think you can give this one a kicking on Twitter. Unfortunately, given the discussion about it yesterday I think I hadto post it. The reviewers can resolve all that stuff.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-01-14 13:19 Andrew Rambaut open

On that note, I am sure I read this hypothesis somewhere before: https://twitter.com/trvrb/status/1349774308202094594
2021-01-14 13:23 Edward C. Holmes open

Aye on both counts. Fucking Trevor!
2021-01-14 13:25 Andrew Rambaut open

That Ohio paper is well out of order. They say - UKnB.1.1.7 (clade 20I/501Y.V1) strain. This is not on - you can'tlabel stuff geographically.
2021-01-14 13:26 Andrew Rambaut open

`containing several likely pathogenic but distinct mutations in the Spike (S) gene, particularly N501Y.` - what? 'likelypathogenic'? Garbage
2021-01-14 13:30 Edward C. Holmes

I think you can give this one a kicking on Twitter. Unfortunately, given the discussion about it yesterday I think I hadto post it. The reviewers can resolve all that stuff.
2021-01-14 14:00 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Kristian Andersen https://twitter.com/Cornedbeefpyatt/status/1349776702239633409?s=20
2021-01-14 14:08 Kristian G. Andersen open

Human geneticists love to use the term "pathogenic mutation". I wonder if that's where it's coming from... Real garbage. I'm glad Trevor supports our hypothesis... :wink:
2021-01-14 14:09 Edward C. Holmes open

I even discussed it with Eric Topol on his podcast!
2021-01-14 14:09 Kristian G. Andersen open

REALLY????

Full conversation →